Difference between Malice in Fact and Malice in Law-
Dr. Tanmoy Mukherji
Advocate
Difference between Malice in Fact and Malice in Law-
Tanmoy Mukherji
Advocate

|
Basis |
Malice in Fact |
Malice in Law |
|
Meaning
|
Malice in fact means actual malice, that is, ill-will, spite, or personal animosity against another person.
|
Malice in law means intentional commission of a wrongful act without lawful justification, even if there is no personal hatred.
|
|
Nature |
Malice in fact is subjective, as it depends on the mental attitude of the person committing the act.
|
Malice in law is objective, as it is inferred from the wrongful nature of the act itself.
|
|
Presence of Ill-will
|
In malice in fact, the presence of ill-will or bad motive is essential.
|
In malice in law, ill-will or bad motive is not necessary.
|
|
Proof
|
Malice in fact must be specifically proved by evidence.
|
Malice in law is presumed by law once it is shown that the act was unlawful or done for an improper purpose.
|
|
Focus
|
Malice in fact focuses on the motive behind the act.
|
Malice in law focuses on the legality and justification of the act, not the motive.
|
|
Application
|
Malice in fact is commonly relevant in cases like defamation and malicious prosecution.
|
Malice in law is commonly applied in cases involving misuse or abuse of statutory or administrative power.
|
|
Case Law Reference
|
Bromage v. Prosser (1825) – malice implies ill-will or improper motive.
|
S. R. Venkataraman v. Union of India (1979) – exercise of power for an unauthorized purpose amount to legal malice.
|
|
Concerned about |
Malice in fact is concerned with personal intention and hostility.
|
Malice in law is concerned with wrongful conduct in law, irrespective of personal feelings.
|